Back to Case studies
// AI / Government

AI-Powered FOIA Data Extraction for Academic Analysis

← All case studies
// client engagement
Written by NextGen Coding Company Engineering Team — senior U.S.-based software engineers and solution architects
Technically reviewed by NextGen Principal Architect (AWS Certified Solutions Architect, 15+ yrs building production systems in fintech, healthcare, and tax technology)
Published Last updated

Tag: AI / Government

AI-Powered FOIA Data Extraction for Academic Analysis. NextGen Coding Company delivered measurable outcomes across engineering, AI, QA, and cloud workstreams.

Client Background

A PhD candidate from a University based in Chicago required a robust data pipeline to support research involving over 25,000 pages of FOIA-obtained documents. The documents detailed plant facilities nationwide and were exported as scanned PDFs from various government databases. The student’s objective was to perform longitudinal analysis of industrial expansion and regulatory timelines across multiple states.

The candidate’s academic success relied on quickly transforming heterogeneous document layouts into a single structured dataset suitable for advanced statistical modeling.

The Problem

The research challenge involved handling inconsistent document layouts across thousands of scanned FOIA files. Traditional extraction tools lacked the flexibility to adapt. Specific blockers included:

  • Unstructured formats with three distinct layout types.

  • Scanned image inputs that prevented direct text parsing.

  • Visual field indicators, such as bolded text, that traditional OCR tools ignored.

  • Split and merged fields across rows and columns, leading to alignment errors.

  • Page-level formatting drift that created row misalignment in exported data.

Without automation, the project would have required months of manual data entry, making it impractical for time-bound academic work and limiting the potential for large-scale analysis.

Our Solution

To address the complexity of scanned FOIA pages, a five-stage technical solution was implemented. Each stage was carefully designed to ensure both automation and interpretability:

Breaking Down Large PDFs

Using PyPDF2, the document corpus was divided into smaller, manageable batches. Each file was processed in segments of 100 pages, further split into 10-page units to minimize formatting contamination. Segmentation allowed targeted extraction logic to adapt to subtle shifts in document structure and prevented the AI model from inheriting faulty layouts across unrelated sections.

NextGen’s approach improved fault isolation, enabling consistent QA controls at the batch level and reducing reprocessing overhead by nearly 30%.

Converting Pages to High-Quality Images

To maximize OCR fidelity, each PDF page was transformed into a high-resolution image via pdf2image. The PIL (Pillow) library was then used to resize, sharpen, and standardize image dimensions. NextGen’s enhancements ensured clean visual inputs for the AI model, even in cases of faded ink or skewed scans.

The image pre-processing routine also integrated google.api_core.exceptions for robust error handling, allowing failed conversions to be retried without compromising batch integrity.

Reading and Understanding the Content

Using the Google Gemini API, each batch of 10 enhanced images was parsed by a multimodal large language model trained for visual-textual interpretation. The model inferred data structure, identified semantic groupings based on bold text cues, and classified information into discrete fields such as Establishment Number, DBA, and Grant Date.

Where residual text was partially machine-readable, pdfminer.six was deployed to complement the LLM’s output. Final structuring was handled using pandas, ensuring column alignment and schema consistency.

NextGen’s inference process included retry logic, error logging, and dynamic adaptation to each format variant.

Cleaning and Structuring the Data

Raw extractions were normalized using pandas to resolve inconsistencies. The pipeline corrected column drift, addressed null or malformed entries, and standardized field formats (e.g., addresses and dates). Each 100-page group was validated individually to prevent systemic contamination.

Data integrity checks included uniqueness tests, schema conformance validation, and duplicate filtering. NextGen’s process enhanced batch consistency and made downstream statistical modeling reliable.

Exporting to Spreadsheet Format

The final datasets were exported using pandas.to_csv(), producing individual CSVs for every batch. The files were later merged into a master Excel workbook compatible with econometrics tools. Field names were validated against original source labels, allowing seamless alignment with the researcher’s analytical framework.

NextGen’s streamlined format enabled direct plug-and-play within existing Booth research models.

Results

  • Accuracy: Proof-of-concept achieved 99% character-level accuracy (406/410 entries correct), full-scale processing maintained >90%.

  • Cost Savings: Delivered under $3,000, compared to $8,000 from other vendors.

  • Processing Speed: 25,000 pages processed in <4 weeks using intelligent batching.

  • QA Efficiency: Two-layer validation system caught 95% of alignment and content issues.

Impact: Enabled timely, clean data access for advanced regression and classification research.

Why It Matters

The case demonstrates the operational scalability of combining AI-based inference with human-in-the-loop QA for high-stakes academic use cases. The structured dataset not only empowered Booth’s research into industrial trends but also validated a repeatable pipeline design for:

  • Legal reviews involving scanned case files

  • Government compliance audits using legacy formats

  • Financial modeling on scanned annual reports

The LLM-driven architecture is scalable to millions of pages and reproducible across other verticals requiring structured output from scanned materials.

Call to Action

NextGen Coding Company delivers high-fidelity data extraction pipelines for academic, legal, and government sectors.

Contact admin@nextgencodingcompany.com or book a call to speak with our solutions team to begin scoping

https://calendly.com/next_gen_coding_company/30min

// case study faq

Frequently asked questions

What did NextGen actually build in this engagement?
NextGen designed and shipped a production system end to end: architecture, data model, application code, integrations, security review, and deployment. A senior U.S.-based team owned delivery from discovery through launch, and the client kept full ownership of the codebase and cloud accounts.
How long does an engagement like this take?
Most engagements of this shape run eight to sixteen weeks from kickoff to production. A discovery and architecture sprint takes two to three weeks, the first working release lands around week six, and the remaining time covers hardening, integrations, and rollout support.
What technologies were used?
Typical stacks on our engagements are React and TypeScript on the front end, Node.js or Python services on the back end, PostgreSQL for data, and AWS or Azure for infrastructure, with AI and machine-learning components where they measurably improve accuracy or throughput.
Can NextGen deliver a similar outcome for us?
Yes. We start with a paid discovery sprint that produces an architecture, a scope, and a fixed price or a staffed team plan. From there you can proceed with a fixed-scope build or a dedicated team. Book a call and we will scope your project against this case study.
// let's build something

Start your project request

Tell us what you're building — engineering capacity, AI, QA, cloud, or a fixed-scope software engagement. Our NYC team responds within one business day.

// what to expect
  • Response within 1 business day
  • 30-minute discovery conversation
  • Recommended engagement model & pricing
  • NYC-focused — in-person available
Start Project Request

Inbound sales only. All form information is encrypted in transit.